While homeopathy has traditionally been criticized and challenged about their actions have been around since practically its inception, I get the feeling that in recent years criticism of homeopathic treatments has increased significantly.
In the UK anti-homeopathy campaign have become a very important force, and influential sectors have supported citizen initiatives and from groups with the power to cut medical practice in Britain. In fact, the Commons Science and Technology Committee of the United Kingdom has sent a proposal of this kind the government, which was officially rejected.
In yesterday discussed the committee’s proposal in the British Medical Association, which held that homeopathy is no more effective than placebo, so that it should be officially banned by the NHS (National Health Services). Anne Milton, Health Minister accepted the proposal but rejected it outright.
Milton stated that it received the proposal, but he believed the NHS and doctors were better able to make decisions about the type of treatment that is appropriate for patients. In fact, homeopathy has a great importance in the United Kingdom, and is prescribed because it effectively gives effect on the health problems of patients.
It is reasonable that were protesting and calling into question such practices, it does not make sense is that those who protest the judge from the perspective of conventional medicine because conventional medicine is NOT.
Homeopathy is alternative medicine, and operates from a different angle. It’s like condemning a citizen of country X under the constitutional rules of another country are incompatible, irreducible to one another. With homeopathy and traditional medicine is the same.